Imagine that you are an employer, intervening candidates for
a job. There are 4 candidates, going for the 1 position available. The first
candidate is an apprentice, with 3 years training and experience in the
industry in question. The second candidate is a graduate, with 3 years of
study, but no experience in the industry. The third is a non-graduate, who has
the voluntary experience needed, but lacks an important certificate
qualification for the job. And the fourth candidate is an adult, with many
years of experience, and some of the qualifications needed. Which of these
people would you be tempted to give the job to?
This is the situation that recruiters are facing now, and
hence, why we need to take steps to make sure that all candidates have a level
playing field. Adults need opportunities too, but they do have one important
advantage: their years of experience, and experience counts for a lot. So young
people especially, need the combination of skills, experience and grades, to
have a good career. Apprentices are the perfect example of this. But the other
young people need to be considered as well, and offered the same kind of
experience or grades. Students, for example, need internships, to be able to
demonstrate experience in the industry.
Student Internships
All students need working experience as interns if they are
to have a chance against their apprentice counterparts. Of course the
challenges to this are many. And from the employers’ point of view, they
already have apprentices and interns in place. More interns would cost money if
paid, and if they were unpaid, could undermine the work of paid full time
employees. I concede that from the full timers’ point of view, they do not want
to be undercut by interns who could do their jobs for free.
So an agreement needs to be reached, as to who has an
internship where and when. Recruiters, University Careers Officers, businesses
and employees’ unions, could coordinate their efforts, to agree on how many
interns would be allowed.
A rota system, in effect, could be created, using agreed
time slots, and locations, so that at any one time, each team of a business has
one intern or apprentice assisting them. It should be made clear to these
interns that they are there to follow their colleagues’ instructions, and to
learn from them; and that they have a finite time to do so. After a few weeks,
the next interns could be brought in, and so on.
Employers’ objections to this would be many. The costs,
training, and liability would discourage businesses from taking on any more
than a few students at a time, to be interns. My response to the employers about
this is: there is one major advantage that you will gain, by employing multiple
students as interns – albeit within a set time frame, and with clear, agreed
limits. That advantage is: individual
knowledge transfer.
Each student is unique. He or she brings a unique life
experience, and hence a different skillset and a different set of ideas to the
table. I’m sure all university staff would agree, that no 2 students – or
interns – are alike. And because they are not yet working in the industry they
study, these students are able to think outside the box: and will be able to
bring new innovations to each business. In return for the mentoring and training
given to student interns, I submit that you, the business owners, can recoup
your investment, by asking that the students research and solve any long term
problems that your businesses face. They are used to having to look into issues
in depth, and may come up with the solution you are looking for.
The other challenge of course, is a logistical one. With
thousands of students per campus, even with good planning, there may be a
finite number of places available for them. With this in mind, care would need
to be taken, to restrict the number of students allowed to apply: a set number
from each college within their University, at any one time.
Non-Graduates’
Qualifications
At the other end of the scale are the young non-graduates. Contrary
to the tabloid press’ negative stereotypes, most of the non-graduates I have
known, are 16-24 year olds, who have gone into work and are trying to work their
up, to get a decent career.
The challenge they face, is getting key qualifications, to
progress to the good positions. For example, an HR position usually requires a
CIPD certificate, for an applicant to get the job. It is hard to get jobs in HR
without this. But of course, without a CIPD certificate, it is then hard to get
into HR roles in the first place, to build up the necessary experience. And the
same goes for all other professions.
So the place to start with non-graduates, is with what they
know already. A non-graduate in a basic role may not have full managerial skills,
but it is likely that he or she may have built up supervisory, or basic
managerial experience, from voluntary or extra work, while in the current job. And
so the non-graduate’s line manager may recommend him/her for a basic assessment
and qualification for managerial skills.
Once the non-graduate has a certificate in this field, this
is a major step forward. I can tell you from experience, even a basic level
qualification can make a big difference. With a certificate qualification in
management already, it will be a lot easier for the non-graduate to prove competency,
and to use this to apply for apprenticeship, training courses, or college, in
that field. In other words, qualified assessment of a non-graduate’s existing
skills, will put him or her in the best possible position, to build a good
career.
Conclusion
In an increasingly competitive, and increasingly global, job
market, apprenticeships have set a brilliant example for us all to follow. The combination
of skills, experience and qualifications, is exactly what candidates – young
people especially – need to get a job. But this has raised the bar for
employers’ expectations, and so we need to make sure that all young people (and
adults) are given the same opportunity. Students need internships;
non-graduates need qualifications. Adults need empowerment. By doing this, we
can ensure that the next time any of these people apply for a job, they will
have both the grades and the experience, to put them in the best position for a
good career.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAs a footnote to my article, I've since found out, that while internships are certainly encouraged by universities and colleges, they are not an integral part of each student's degree.
ReplyDeleteIn the past, students could take graduate trainee schemes, to get the experience. But as one manager pointed out to me, it costs money to train people up to the level needed for a job; and after all: why invest all that money, when you have an apprentice, who already has the training, and could start in a role tomorrow?
In fairness, the apprentices themselves should not be blamed for our increasingly competitive job market. They have done brilliantly. All apprentices I have known, have gone straight into work, and some have even won awards. This success is well earned. At the same time however, it a simple fact that not all young people have apprenticeships, and so we must be mindful, for the career prospects of the others.
Non-graduates also face this challenge, for similar reasons. I believe, that most of these 16-24 year olds (and their adult counterparts), have a lot of experience, from the work they have done - certainly all the ones I have known.
These young people have the experience, but need qualified assessment to demonstrate the necessary grades. From speaking with youth organisations, I am pleased that certain certificate qualifications are offered, but there seem to be mainly 4-5 ones, and the non-graduates' organisations must apply for the funding for these.
It would be more useful, if non-graduates were offered a wider range of certificate qualifications, such as customer service, admin, managerial, manual handling or business skills. These grades are very useful for a variety of roles, and I think that if they were all offered as an integral part of Youth Engagement Teams' and Job Centres' support, this would help non-graduates' careers.
For both non-graduates and (non-apprentice) students, I believe it is essential that these measures are made compulsory. Students must have internships as part of their degrees, and non-graduates must have qualified assessment of their ungraded skills. This will give them a fighting chance alongside their apprentice counterparts.
This will ensure that all young people have the same opportunities for a good career.